Issue Between Intel and NVidia

So basically, it all started when Nvidia announced plans for the future development of motherboard chipsets that will support Intel's new Core i7 Nehalem architecture. Intel has tried to speak from the nVidia with this plan, but nVidia has kept his plan and began developing a new motherboard chipset that nVidia would let fans use the Core i7 processors on Nvidia chipsets, which fans have the power of Core i7 and Tri-SLI GPU.

However, Intel did not want to go to nVidia with the plans, and this is the case in court, saying that Nvidia has a license to create chipsets that support Intel's QPI (QuickPath Interconnect) system and an integrated memory controller technology. However, Nvidia claims that are several years old license that allows them to be exact thing.

But what is really the issue here? It really just Intel trying to maintain their advantage, among others. Currently, only Intel's X58 chipset motherboard supports Intel's incredibly strong Corei7 Nehalem processors. Basically, Intel is sort of a monopoly going on in the industry, Core i7, because the development and manufacture of both processors and motherboards that work together.

Now, Nvidia wants a piece of cake. In previous years, Nvidia has successfully developed chipsets that support the Core 2 series processors (680i, 780i, 790i Ultra, among others), and they are very popular, competing well against Intel's own chipsets (P35, X48, P45, etc.) .. And now, Intel has launched a processor that exceeds many of the Core 2 processors that cost much more than the Core i7 processor. NVidia is definitely hungry for a big piece of this new series of processors, and now is trying to do the same thing has succeeded in making the reign of Core 2 processors.

So, here is a summary of what Intel will lose if nVidia succeeds in developing its new chipsets:

1 Intel will lose the advantage of saying that their X58 motherboards are the only motherboards that support Core i7 processors

2 Intel will no longer be able to have an advantage over Nvidia Core i7 and X58 motherboard, because nVidia will be able to create chipsets that enable the Core i7 and Tri-SLI graphics cards to work in harmony. X58 motherboards support up to SLI.

AMD at Intel's Heels, Where Are We Heading?

Intel Corporation was founded in 1968 as Integrated Electronics Corporation, based in Santa Clara, California, USA. In 1991, Intel has achieved a number one ranking of the semiconductor market share, and they held fast to their positions today. Semiconductor technology advancing at a rate of relentless, fast throw-away society and technology tends to generation. In a market where innovation and invention play such vital roles, it is an outstanding achievement for Intel kept one step ahead, keeping the crown among the competitors.

But who is there to compete against the CPU giant? Last year, Intel boasted an impressive profit margin of 22.3%, leaving plenty of slack to reduce prices in the face of competition. With the recent integration of Intel's technology, Apple, who chose to adopt the Pentium CPUs for workstations, it seems Intel is based are set firmly in the uneasy ground semiconductor markets.

AMD, Advanced Micro Devices, a U.S. manufacturer of integrated circuits based in Sunnyvale, California. This is the second largest supplier of x86-compatible, or desktop workstations, mobile and small-scale server processors, Intel follows. AMD is 15 among the world's top twenty-semiconductor sales leaders, generating revenues of $ 3.9 billion in 2005.

AMD worked as a licensed second source manufacturer Intel processors, but in the face of the growing popularity of the PC clone market, in 1986 Intel decided to do without it considers its competitors to start production of a CPU on its own terms. This action led to a prolonged and bitter legal dispute in which he claimed AMD Intel has violated its ugovor.Vrhovni Court of California agreed, and forced Intel to pay over $ 1 billion in compensation.

In 1991, AMD released the Am386 processor, and then with the Am486 in 1993. Both are competitively priced, undercutting Intel equivalent. AMD quickly established a foothold in the semiconductor market, particularly in computers and workstations on the level, selling millions of units of the former in less than a year.

more than a decade, and AMD continues to increase its share to keep the semiconductor market, carried out its competitors with aggressive pricing and partnerships. Today, 24 July 2006, AMD has announced the acquisition of ATI, a major supplier of desktop graphics cards, a transaction valued at approximately U.S. $ 5.4 billion. As our process-centric to play more roles in our lives, it is not difficult to imagine a day when the PC is sitting alongside, or even integrated into any TV. With innovations such as Sky + customers on the idea of ​​opening the media center computer in their living rooms, and then their cars and mobile phones, its clear why AMD sees potential in the development of processors with integrated graphics functions and routines.

major semiconductor market is an exciting experience at both ends, but as consumers we have only benefited from increased competition and demand, and de-monopolisation of the semiconductor market. New products from either side of such competition increases innovation and lowers prices, which may be good news!

Xeon Comparison - Compare Chipset Specifications For the Most Popular Intel Processor Series

This is the Xeon comparison.

Xeon microprocessor has its roots in the AMD processors Dual Core processors, P6, based on the system and Pentium II processors. It comes out of Intel and a 64-bit multi-core, multi-threading capabilities. It is meant to be used in servers and workstations.

Xeon comes with software that DCM Data Center Management Software. The competition also includes the i7 from Intel, with 64-bit processor and quad-core, that is great for desktops with multi-tasking performance, plus, it's HD Boost technology, which is great for gamers.

Large core processors such as those with 8-core assembly does not work with many games. Price wise, the i7 is more expensive than the Xeon than the smallest unit goes up to $ 3,000, while the prices of Xeon is kept between $ 284 and $ 550 -. $ 560

Intel Xeon processor family come equipped with different size stores, each with unique features. The names of those Xeons are Intel Xeon processor with 256K L2 cache with a voltage range from 1250VA to 1400VA ($ 75), the Intel Xeon processor with 512K L2 cache, Intel Xeon processor 1U rack servers with 512K L2 cache ($ 259), Intel Xeon processors with 800 MHz system bus and 1 or 2 MB L2 Cache ($ 350 - $ 1,000). and at the end of the processor Intel Xeon MP ($ 2500) that uniquely supports multiprocessor server design

Xeon with 256K supports dual-processor workstation is compatible with the Intel 860 chipset and has at its disposal rate 1.40, 1.50, 1.70 and 2 GHz. It ships with a tunnel of wind power.

Xeon processor with 512 K L2 cache, supports dual processor workstation and server design, is compatible with the Intel E7210, Intel E7500, Intel E7501 and Intel 860 chipset, the Hyper-Threading technology, which has hardware support for multi-threaded server application and ships with the PWT (force of the wind tunnel). Its available speeds are 1.80, 2, 2.20, 2.40, 2.60, 2.80, 3, 3.06 and 3.20 GHz as the Xeon processor 1U rack servers and Xeon with 800 MHz work.

speeds available on Intel Xeon MP are only up to 3 MHz and 800 MHz there is a speed of 3.60 MHz.

All core Intel Xeon processor, 256K of L2 cache Intel Xeon MP processors come with Intel Netburst micro-architecture and Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (800MHz with 3 expansion ).

Processor Intel Xeon MP sports 3 levels of cache memory with 4MB, 2MB, 1MB, 512KB or 256KB. All the remaining units and sport HyperThreading technology the same as Xeon with 512KB L2 cache.